Not all grand juries are gullible, but most all can be misled to some degree, especially when these citizens have very little experience or knowledge of the subject matter, or context. Perhaps, this is what happens when grand juries call for indictments such a large percentage of the time when Federal Prosecutors come to them to seek such. Let’s discuss this a little, shall we?
There was an interesting YouTube Video by the “Fan Dick Morris Channel” titled: “Blockbuster! New Judge May Dismiss A Plea Bargain,” which was published on February 21, 2018. In the show notes it points to an opinion article by Dick Morris posted online in the Western Sates Journal titled: “Dick Morris: A Conviction Could Be Thrown Out,” also on February 21, 2018. The article states:
“The U.S. District Judge ordered prosecution to present any ‘Brady’ material (exculpatory evidence) in its possession to the court. He particularly wanted any Brady material that the prosecution had in its possession during the negotiations that led to a guilty plea. What makes this order unusual is that it comes after the individual pleaded guilty and, in the plea agreement, agreed to forgo any further discovery of new evidence. Now the judge’s order overrides the plea and orders evidence to be presented anyway.”